Rubi HartzUX / UI DESIGNER
← Selected work
Abrigo · Concept exploration

Agentic AI in AML Alerts

Making AI research visible. Keeping review in human hands.

Agentic AI in AML Alerts project overview
Agentic AI in AML Alerts / Selected project
MY CONTRIBUTION

Interaction & interface design exploration

AT A GLANCE

A concept for showing agent progress, connecting findings to evidence, and preparing draft explanations within an alert-review workflow.

Project overview

Anti-money laundering (AML) work involves reviewing activity that may deserve a closer look. An alert signals a possible issue; it does not establish wrongdoing. This concept explores how an AI agent could gather context and prepare findings before a bank employee reviews the evidence and decides what to do.

The opportunity

The proposed direction extends AI assistance beyond a summary: an agent could work through supporting information and prepare a review. The design challenge is to make that work visible and understandable, so a reviewer can distinguish unfinished research from a completed recommendation.

Show what the agent is doing

The alert list introduces visible states: Pending, Researching, Complete, and Not Applicable. Completed rows show a recommendation such as Clear, Watch, or Send to Case. The status and recommendation occupy separate columns, distinguishing progress from the suggested next step.

Bring the reasoning into the review

The detail screen combines a recommendation, a summary, and supporting evidence. Additional panels organize scenario insights, customer context, previous activity, and account information. An Agent Findings card includes a View Evidence action, giving the reviewer a path from a concise finding to its supporting material.

Alert detail concept with AI evidence, agent findings and a labeled draft comment
Concept: review supporting evidence, inspect agent findings, and evaluate a draft explanation. Open the image to view full-size details.

Help with documentation

The comments area includes an Agent [Draft] label above a proposed explanation. This presents the text as a starting point for review. The concept also retains the main Clear and Send to Case actions, rather than hiding the decision behind the agent’s summary.

Questions to validate next

The next step would be to test whether reviewers understand the research states, distinguish a recommendation from a decision, and can find the evidence they need. Other questions include how to show incomplete research, conflicting evidence, failures, and changes made to a draft. These are proposed validation questions, not completed research findings.

Project status

Design exploration shown in the supplied Figma file. The screens illustrate a proposed experience; they do not establish a working AI implementation, production release, or measured impact.

CONTINUE EXPLORING

More thoughtful work.

Back to selected projects ↗